Full Text Article

Heart Function and Ventricular Recovery after Percutaneous Closure of Peri-Membranous Ventricular Septal Defect in Children: A Cross-Sectional Study

Received Date: February 06, 2022 Accepted Date: March 06, 2022 Published Date: March 08, 2022

doi: 10.17303/jcvm.2022.8.103

Citation:Hamid Amoozgar (2022) Heart Function and Ventricular Recovery after Percutaneous Closure of Peri-Membranous Ventricular Septal Defect in Children: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Cardio Vasc Med 8: 1-10.

Background: Peri-membranous ventricular septal defect (VSD) is the most common congenital heart defect. There is a trend for percutaneous VSD closure.

Objectives: The purpose of our study is to investigate the effect of percutaneous closure of peri-membranous VSD on cardiac function and ventricular recovery.

Methods: Forty-six pediatric patients (32 males, 14 females) who underwent transcatheter closure of peri-membranous VSD from 2010 to 2020 were included randomly. Data regarding the demographic profile, angiographic records, and follow-up echocardiography were extracted from their files and recorded in questionnaire templates. The echocardiographic parameters were recorded and compared with published Z-scores for pediatric age groups.

Results: The mean duration of follow-up was 15.76±12.20 months. In M-mode echocardiography, 84.6% had IVSDd Z-score ≥2; 23.8% had IVSDs Z-score ≥2; 38.5% had LVIDd Z-score ≥2; 34.6% had LVIDs Z-score ≥2; 65.4% had LVPWd Z-score ≥2. In the evaluation of Doppler and tissue Doppler, 36.4% of the patients had a Z-score of more than two for E/Ea of tricuspid. VSD size had a positive correlation with IVSs Z-Score (p=0.015, r=0.537).

Conclusions: In the midterm follow-up after percutaneous peri-membranous VSD closure, left ventricular dilation and hypertrophy persisted in a significant number of patients. Early closure of the VSD in lower age and lower weight may also affect the remodeling and hemodynamic of ventricles.

Keywords: Ventricular Remodeling; Echocardiography; Hemodynamics; Cardiac Catheterization; Heart Septal Defects

Ventricular septal defect (VSD) is the most common congenital heart defect worldwide [1, 2]. Peri-membranous VSDs accounts for about 70% of the cases [3]. Due to the advances in imaging and screening of infants, the detection rate of confirmed cases of VSD has risen considerably [4]. Approximately 45% of VSDs which occur in isolation close spontaneously [5]. Surgical treatment is often recommended for patients with medium and larger defects [1]. Although traditional surgical procedures have shown excellent results, they still carry risks such as complete atrioventricular block, residual shunt, post-pericardiotomy syndrome, wound infection, reoperation, aortic regurgitation, outflow tract obstruction, and even death [2, 6, 7].

Since the introduction of transcatheter VSD closure in 1988 (8), this catheter-based approach has been widely used as an alternative to open-heart surgery with acceptable mortality and morbidity as well as promising results [9-16]. Nevertheless, this technique is also associated with complications such as complete heart block, aortic insufficiency, hemolysis, and embolization of the device [1].

Few studies have evaluated the effect of transcatheter closure of VSD on heart remodeling after percutaneous VSD closure [17]. Hence, the purpose of our study is to investigate the intermediate-term effect of the catheter-based approach for peri-membranous VSD closure on heart function and ventricular recovery.

The present study was designed as a cross-sectional survey of cardiac remodeling and heart function in patients under 14 years of age who had undergone percutaneous VSD closure by occluder device from 2010 to 2020 in Namazi hospital of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. Data were collected randomly from our electronic database and recorded in questionnaire templates with the informed consent of all participants’ guardians and the approval of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences ethics committee (ethics code: IR.SUMS.MED.REC.1399.196). Patients’ demographic profiles, including age, sex, body weight, duration of follow-up, echocardiography, and angiographic records regarding VSD size, size of the occluder device, and complications during angiography, were collected and recorded in questionnaires. The patients under 14 years of age without another congenital heart disease, with peri-membranous VSD, uncomplicated VSD closure, QP/QS more than 1.5, left ventricular dilation, and without residual VSD were enrolled in this study. The patients with a residual shunt, other associated congenital or valvular disease, heart block, or bundle branch block were excluded from the study. All patients were followed by M-mode, 2- dimensional, flow Doppler, and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) echocardiography methods.

Transthoracic echocardiography method

Echocardiography was performed with Samsung HS70 (Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. / Samsung Medison Co., Ltd.) with 2-4 and 3-7 MHz probe, on apical four chambers, subcostal, long axis, and short axis views. In the parasternal long axis view, left ventricular dimensions in systole and diastole, interventricular septal thickness and ejection fraction were recorded. In four chambers view, the cursor was placed on mitral and tricuspid valve leaflets, and the inflow E and A velocity was measured. Furthermore, in four chambers view, TDI was obtained as the cursor was placed 1 cm apical to the mitral and tricuspid annuli, and pulse wave Doppler velocity was in the -20 to +20 cm/sec. An experienced pediatric cardiologist performed all echocardiograms, and the parameters were obtained in three cycles, and the average values were used in the study. The following parameters were obtained: interventricular septum diastolic diameter (IVSDd), interventricular septum systolic diameter (IVSDs), left ventricular internal diameter in diastole (LVIDd), left ventricular internal diameter in systole (LVIDs), left ventricular posterior wall in diastole (LVPWd), left ventricular posterior wall in systole (LVPWs), left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), left ventricular fractional shortening (FS), early diastolic velocity of mitral valve (Em), atrial contractility velocity of mitral (Am), early diastolic velocity of tricuspid valve (Et), atrial contractility velocity of tricuspid (At), early diastolic velocity of lateral mitral annulus (EaM), late diastolic velocity of lateral mitral annulus (AaM), early diastolic velocity of lateral tricuspid annulus (EaT), late diastolic velocity of lateral tricuspid annulus (Aat). According to published Z-Score values in the pediatric age group, echocardiography data were determined and expressed as Z-Scores [18-20].

Statistical analysis

Descriptive data were presented as means and standard deviations (SD), frequencies, and percentages. Normal distribution of data was obtained by Kolmogorov-Smirnov, and differences in continuous variables were compared using an independent t-test. Pearson correlation was used to analyze univariate associations between continuous variables. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for nonparametric variables. All analyses were done using SPSS for Windows (version 22). P-value less than 0.05 was taken as statistical significance.

Totally, 46 patients (32 males (69.6%) and 14 females (30.4%)) with a mean age of 4.77±2.69 years and mean weight of 16.27±6.05 Kg were randomly selected and enrolled in the study. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants are as shown in (Table 1).
32.4% of patients were younger than three years of age, 62.2% of patients aged less than five years of age, while only 2.7% were older than ten years of age. 88.9% of patients weighed less than 20Kg (Figure 1) (Table 2).

In M-mode echocardiography, 84.6% had IVSDd Z-score ≥2; 23.8% had IVSDs Z-score ≥2; 38.5% had LVIDd Z-score ≥2; 34.6% had LVIDs Z-score ≥2; 65.4% had LVPWd Z-score ≥2; Table 2 demonstrates the characteristics of M-mode echocardiography of left ventricle.

In the evaluation of Doppler and tissue Doppler, 36.4% of the patients had Z-score of E/Ea for tricuspid more than two. Other parameters were within normal limit and as shown in Table 3.

The echocardiographic data were compared between the patients whose VSD was closed before and after three years of age. Z score of EaT and ET/EaT Z-Score was significantly higher in patients more than three years of age than those aged less than three years old (p=0.031). Comparison of the variables are shown in Table 4.

Patients were divided into two groups regarding their weight with cut-off points of 15 Kg. Z-Scores for LVPWs, LVEF, LVFS, EM/AM, and ET/AT were higher in patients less than 15Kg at the time of VSD closure. However, AT Z-Score was lower in them comparing to patients more than 15 Kg (p=0.045). Mean ± SDs and p values are as shown in Table 5.

Patients were divided into two groups regarding their VSD size with a cut-off point of 10 mm. IVSs Z-Score was lower in patients with a VSD size of less than 10 mm than those with a VSD size of more than 10 mm (p=0.038). AaM Z-Score was lower in patients with VSD size of less than 10 mm compared to those with VSD size of more than 10mm (p=0.030). Mean ± SD and p values are as demonstrated in Table 6.

There was a positive correlation between the patients’ age and AT Z-Score (p=0.014, r=0.458). Moreover, the patients’ weight had positive correlation with ET Z-Score (p=0.038, r=0.426) and AT Z-Score (p=0.001, r=0.631). VSD size of the patients had a positive correlation with IVSs Z-Score (p=0.015, r=0.537) while it was negatively correlated with EM Z-Score (p=0.015, r=-0.470) and ET/EaT Z-Score (p=0.029, r=-0.499). Table 7 shows the correlation between Age, Weight, VSD size, and other variables. 

Peri-membranous VSD is the most frequent subtype of congenital heart disease (CHD) [21]. Transcatheter closure of VSD has been preferred in several countries due to imposing less invasion and showing promising outcomes [22].

In the present study, we compared the patient’s echocardiographic variables with published Z-Scores reported according to body surface area.

In this study, a significant number of patients had an inter-ventricular and posterior wall thickness more than normal, and the size of VSD had a positive correlation with septal thickness. Aminullah et al. studied 24 patients with mean age of 12.60±12.09 years who had undergone surgical closure of VSD. They found that left ventricular posterior wall thickness and inter-ventricular septum thickness decreased three months after surgery, and the changes were more significant in the younger age group [23]. Cordell et al. suggested in a study of post-surgical VSD closure LV function and LV mass in the first two years of life that when early surgical closure of VSD is necessary, promising results in terms of postoperative left ventricular size and function can be expected. They demonstrated that LV mass was mildly elevated at the preoperative assessment, which was decreased significantly following surgical repair [24].

Left ventricular dilation was seen in about one-third of the patients. Zheng et al. in a study of 30 patients following transcatheter closure of VSD, reported that left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and left ventricular end-diastolic volume both started to decrease as soon as three days following the intervention, this trend continued for six months (17). Yasmin Abdelrazek et al. evaluated left ventricular systolic function after VSD closure using speckle tracking, which showed decreased LV volume overload with improved contractility [25].

In the evaluation of Doppler and tissue Doppler, one-third of the patients had Z-score of E/Ea of tricuspid more than normal, showing persistence of right-sided diastolic abnormality. In a study conducted by Klitsie et al. after one year of surgical VSD closure, LV systolic function became normal. In contrast, RV systolic function remained impaired up to 20 months after surgery [26].

Long-term evaluation of the patients after surgical peri-membranous VSD closure showed long-term survival in the patients with peri-membranous VSD closure seems to be fair, but not without any event. Some patients established significant aortic regurgitation or left ventricular outflow obstruction regardless of VSD repair. Some subjects without any predisposing factor developed atrial arrhythmia who need pacemaker implantation [27].

In the present study, the patients' age correlated positively with AT Z-Score, and their weight correlated positively with ET Z-Score and AT Z-Score, and negatively with EM-Z Score and ET/EaT Z-Score. More studies are needed to evaluate the significance of these parameters in the future of the patients.

Some data was extracted retrospectively, which led to missing values and a lower statistical power. A more extended study is recommended for determining the significance of Doppler and tissue Doppler parameters.

In the midterm follow-up after percutaneous closure of peri-membranous VSD, left ventricular dilation and hypertrophy persisted in a significant number of patients. Early closure of VSD in lower age and lower weight can also affect the remodeling and hemodynamic of ventricles.

  1. Li H, Shi Y, Zhang S, Ren Y, Rong X, et al. (2019) Short-and medium-term follow-up of transcatheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects. BMC cardiovascular disorders 19: 222.
  2. Minette MS, Sahn DJ (2006) Ventricular septal defects. Circulation 114: 2190-7
  3. Yang J, Yang L, Wan Y, Zuo J, Zhang J, et al. (2010) Transcatheter device closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects: mid-term outcomes. European heart J 31: 2238-45.
  4. Hoffman JIE, Kaplan S (2002) The incidence of congenital heart disease. Journal of the American college of cardiology 39: 1890-900.
  5. Kidd L, Driscoll DJ, Gersony WM, Hayes CJ, Keane JF (1993) O'Fallon WM, et al. Second natural history study of congenital heart defects. Results of treatment of patients with ventricular septal defects. Circulation. 1993;87(2 Suppl): I38.
  6. Yeager SB, Freed MD, Keane JF, Norwood WI, Castaneda AR (1984) Primary surgical closure of ventricular septal defect in the first year of life: results in 128 infants. J the American College of Cardiology 3: 1269-76.
  7. Gaynor JW, O'Brien Jr JE, Rychik J, Sanchez GR, DeCampli WM, Spray TL (2001) Outcome following tricuspid valve detachment for ventricular septal defects closure. European J cardio-thoracic surgery 19: 279-82.
  8. Lock JE, Block PC, McKay RG, Baim DS, Keane JF (1988) Transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defects. Circulation 78: 361-8.
  9. Bridges ND, Perry SB, Keane JF, Goldstein SAN, Mandell V, Mayer Jr JE, et al. (1991) Preoperative transcatheter closure of congenital muscular ventricular septal defects. New England Journal of Medicine 324: 1312-7.
  10. Kalra GS, Verma PK, Dhall A, Singh S, Arora R (1999) Transcatheter device closure of ventricular septal defects: immediate results and intermediate-term follow-up. American heart J 138: 339-44.
  11. Pedra CAC, Pedra SRF, Esteves CA, Pontes Jr SC, Braga SLN, Arrieta SR, et al. (2004) Percutaneous closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects with the Amplatzer device: technical and morphological considerations. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 61: 403-10.
  12. Butera G, Carminati M, Chessa M, Piazza L, Abella R, Negura DG, et al. (2006) Percutaneous closure of ventricular septal defects in children aged< 12: early and mid-term results. European heart J 27: 2889-95.
  13. Holzer R, de Giovanni J, Walsh KP, Tometzki A, Goh TH, Hakim F, et al. (2006) Transcatheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects using the Amplatzer membranous VSD occluder: immediate and midterm results of an international registry. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 68: 620-8.
  14. Thanopoulos BVD, Rigby ML, Karanasios E, Stefanadis C, Blom N, Ottenkamp J, et al. (2007) Transcatheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects in infants and children using the Amplatzer perimembranous ventricular septal defect occluder. The American journal of cardiology 99: 984-9.
  15. Xunmin C, Shisen J, Jianbin G, Haidong W, Lijun W (2007) Comparison of results and complications of surgical and Amplatzer device closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects. International J cardiology 120: 28-31.
  16. Qin Y, Chen J, Zhao X, Liao D, Mu R, Wang S, et al. (2008) Transcatheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defect using a modified double-disk occluder. The American J cardiology 101: 1781-6.
  17. Zheng Z-F, Pu X-Q, Yang T-L, Chen X-B, Li C-C, Mo L, et al. (2007) Short and mid-term effects of percutaneous transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defects on the cardiac remodeling. Journal of Central South University Medical Sciences 32: 320-2.
  18. Eidem BW, McMahon CJ, Cohen RR, Wu J, Finkelshteyn I, Kovalchin JP, et al. (2004) Impact of cardiac growth on Doppler tissue imaging velocities: a study in healthy children. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 17: 212-21.
  19. Parameterz. Cardiac Z-Scores 2020.
  20. PEDZ. Cardiac Z-Scores 2020.
  21. Liu Y, Chen S, Zühlke L, Black GC, Choy M-k, Li N, et al. (2019) Global birth prevalence of congenital heart defects 1970–2017: updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 260 studies. International J epidemiology 48: 455-63.
  22. Landman G, Kipps A, Moore P, Teitel D, Meadows J (2013) Outcomes of a modified approach to transcatheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 82: 143-9.
  23. Aminullah M, Sarker SR, Hasan R, Rahman M, Hoque R (2016) Outcomes of Posterior Wall Thickness, Interventricular Septal Thickness and LA diameter after Surgical Closure of Ventricular Septal Defect in Different Age Group. University Heart J 12: 12-6.
  24. Cordell D, Graham Jr TP, Atwood GF, Boerth RC, Boucek RJ, Bender HW. Left heart volume characteristics following ventricular septal defect closure in infancy. Circulation 54: 294-8.
  25. Ali YA, Hassan MA, Fiky AAEL (2019) Assessment of left ventricular systolic function after VSD transcatheter device closure using speckle tracking echocardiography. The Egyptian Heart J 71: 1.
  26. Klitsie LM, Kuipers IM, Roest AAW, Van der Hulst AE, Stijnen T, Hazekamp MG, et al. (2016) Disparity in right vs left ventricular recovery during follow-up after ventricular septal defect correction in children. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 44: 269-74.
  27. Gabriels C, De Backer J, Pasquet A, Paelinck BP, Morissens M, Helsen F, et al. (2017) Long-term outcome of patients with perimembranous ventricular septal defect: results from the Belgian registry on adult congenital heart disease. Cardiology 136: 147-55.
CommentsTable 1 CommentsTable 2 CommentsTable 3 CommentsTable 4 CommentsTable 5 CommentsTable 6 CommentsTable 7
CommentsFigure 1