Intensity of Importance
Definition
Explanation
1
Equal Importance
Requirements I and j are equal value
3
Moderate Importance
Requirements I has slightly higher value than j
5
Strong Importance
Requirements I has strongly higher value than j
7
Very Strong Importance
Requirements I has very strongly higher value than j
9
Extreme Importance
Requirements I has very an absolutely higher value than j
2,4,6,8
Intermediate Values
These are Intermediate scales between two adjacent judgments
Table 1: Scoring Scale of AHP
N
RI
0
2
0,58
4
0,90
1,12
6
1,24
Table 2: Random Consistency Index Table
CI Tool Alternativesl
Alternative 1
Alternative 2
Alternative 3
Alternative 4
Table 3: Random Consistency Index Table
The Criteria
Functionality
FlexibiIity & Expandability
Compatibility
Reliability
Table 4: Criteria
Mean Priorities of the Alternatives
Normalized By Cluster
0,371432
0,288618
0,1911942
0,1487562
Table 5: Mean Priorities of the Alternatives
Figure 1: Step of the Case Study
Figure 2: General Hierarcy Structure o AHP
Figure 3: Study Gruop Graduated Department
Figure 4: Expectations from the continuous Integration tool features of Study Group
Figure 5: The AHP hierarchy structure of the component selection
Figure 6: The mean of criteria weights
Tables at a glance
Figures at a glance