Table 1: Demographic & risk factors comparison between different studied groups

	Group A(No= 30)	Group B(No= 30)	Group C(No= 31)	Stat.Test	P- Value
Stent apposition	18	30	31	28.1*	< 0.001 (HS)
Full stent Expansion	0	17	21	32.9*	< 0.001 (HS)
Malapposition	12	0	0	28.1*	< 0.001 (HS)
Minimal Residual Stenosis	30	14	10	32*	< 0.001 (HS)
Uniform Stent Expansion	30	30	31	-----	-------
Absence of edge dissection	30	30	31	-----	-------
Plaque Prolapse	0	0	0	-----	-------
Proximal reference external elastic membrane area (mm2)	7.9 (6.9 – 10)	8 (7.4 – 10.4)	9.8 (7.4 – 10.1)	2.9**	0.23 (NS)
Proximal reference lumen area (mm²)	6.5 (5.7 – 9.1)	6.8 (6.3 – 9.3)	9.6 (7.1 – 9.7)	15.2**	0.001 (S)
Distal reference external elastic membrane area (mm²)	8.5 (6.6 – 10.4)	9.1 (6.9 – 10.7)	10.3 (7.5 – 13.1)	6.3**	0.043 (S)
Distal reference lumen area (mm²)	6.4 (5.6 – 9)	6.6 (6.2 – 9.1)	9.4 (7 – 9.6)	17.5**	< 0.001 (HS)
MLD (mm²)	2.9 (2.7 – 3.4)	2.9 (2.8 – 3.4)	3.4 (3 – 3.5)	15.5**	< 0.001 (HS)
MLA (mm²)	6.3 (5.5 – 9)	6.6 (6.2 – 9.1)	8.8 (7 – 9.6)	16.2**	< 0.001 (HS)

Table 2: Comparison of all studied groups with respect to IVUS data

**KW: Kruskal Willis test.

*X2: Chi-square test

IQR: inter-quartile range

IVUS Parameters	Group A(No= 30)		Group B(No= 30)		Group C(No= 31)		Stat.Test	P- Value
	YES	NO	YES	NO	YES	NO
Full Stent Expansion	0	30	17	30	22	10
Appropriate Stent Apposition	18	12	30	0	31	0
Minimal Residual Stenosis	30	0	30	0	31	0
Adequate Stent Expansion	27	3	30	0	31	0
Absence of Complications	30	0	30	0	31	0
SUCCESSFUL	0 (0%)		17 (56.7%)		22 (71%)		35*	< 0.001 (hs)

Table 3: Comparison of all studied groups regarding the success criteria

*X2: Chi-square test

	B	SE	Odds	95% CI	P-value
AGE	0.012	0.038	1.012	(0.94 - 1.09)	0.743
Hypertension	0.142	0.446	1.153	(0.48 - 2.76)	0.750
Diabetes mellites	-0.595	0.429	0.552	(0.23 - 1.27)	0.166
Smoking	0.647	0.429	1.910	(0.82 - 4.43)	0.131
Dyslipidemia	-0.051	0.424	0.950	(0.41 - 2.18)	0.904
Coronary artery affected	-0.104	0.105	0.901	(0.73 - 1.11)	0.325
Location of stenosis	0.069	0.311	1.071	(0.58 - 1.97)	0.825
% of stenosis	-0.102	0.053	0.903	(0.81 - 1.00)	0.052
Type of the lesion	1.065	0.245	2.9	(1.8 - 4.7)	<0.001
Calcification	2.148	0.527	8.568	(3.05 - 24.08)	<0.001
Length of lesion	0.023	0.053	1.023	(0.92 - 1.14)	0.671
No. of balloon inflation	-1.84	0.38	0.16	(0.08 - 0.33)	<0.001
Stent length	0.020	0.055	1.020	(0.92 - 1.14)	0.713
Stent diameter	-0.797	0.589	0.451	(0.14 - 1.43)	0.176
Inflation pressure	-0.27	0.12	0.76	(0.6 - 0.97)	0.03
TIMI flow score	-20.975	23206	0.000	0.000	0.999
MBG score	-1.8	0.5	0.16	(0.06 - 0.42)	<0.001
Stent apposition	-21.178	11603	0.000	0.000	0.999
Full stent Expansion	-25.154	6520	0.000	0.000	0.997
Malapposition	21.178	11603	0.000	0.000	0.999
Minimal Residual Stenosis	24.461	6608	0.000	0.000	0.997
Proximal reference external elastic membrane area	-0.26	0.13	0.77	(0.6 - 0.99)	0.04
Proximal reference lumen area	-0.279	0.123	0.756	(0.59 - 0.96)	0.023
Distal reference external elastic membrane area	-0.057	0.081	0.945	(0.81 - 1.11)	0.483
Distal reference lumen area	-0.293	0.126	0.746	(0.58 - 0.95)	0.02
Minimal luminal diameter (MLD)	-1.370	0.596	0.254	(0.08 - 0.82)	0.022
Minimal luminal area (MLA)	-0.319	0.127	0.727	(0.57 - 0.93)	0.012

Table 4: Predictors of stent deployment failure

B: Regression coefficient, SE: Standard error, CI: Confidence interval.

Table 5: Predictors of stent deployment success & its impact on MBG

*X2: Chi-square test. ** MW: Mann–Whitney U test IQR: inter-quartile range