Figure 1: Diseased implants have a lower microbial diversity
|
No. of Species (95%CI) |
Shannon diversity |
Simpson diversity |
Chao1 diversity (95%CI) |
Case/disease |
73.0 (71.0-75.0) |
2.63 (2.54-2.72) |
0.67 (0.54-0.80) |
73.00 (71.04- |
Ctrl |
73.00 (71.04- |
4.18 (3.14-5.21) |
0.88 (0.77-0.99) |
0.88 (0.77-0.99) |
Table 1: Materials used in the study and the manufacturer's information
Figure 1: Diseased implants have a lower microbial diversity
Figure 2: Microbial taxonomy for healthy and diseased implants
The left panel shows the taxonomy for all species, where the species present in the case group (peri-implantitis; may also appear in the control group) are colored red. Thus, the species shown in black are only present in the control group. We also provide the false discovery rate (FDR) and fold change (fc) for species with FDR<0.6. The right panel shows the reads per million (RPM) for the 5 samples respectively. The legend to the right with the color coding provides the RPM
Figure 3: Microbial species unique to peri-implantitis cases
The bar graphs illustrate the microbial species unique to the peri-implantitis cases. The FDR and p values are given for each species
Figure 4: Microbial species related to periodontal disease, caries, and peri-implantitis The bar graphs illustrate the microbial species related to periodontal disease, caries, and peri-implantitis. The FDR and p values are given for each species
Tables at a glance
Figures at a glance