Table 1: Test of the soil of the growth media

Table 2: Analysis of Hyssop variance in terms of examined strains

* Meaningful difference at α = 0.05

** Meaningful difference at α = 0.01

ns: no meaningful difference.

Treatments			Average of strains
Name	Phosphate fertilizer	PSB Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria	Height of bush	Length of brunch	Number of brunch	Essence level
P0	0	No	c6/48	c2/19	c8/9	c58/0
P90	90	No	b53	b8/20	b3/11	a71/0
P115	115	No	a55	a4/21	ab5/11	ab68/0
P140	140	No	a2/55	a9/21	a12	abc63/0
P165	165	No	a5/55	a8/21	ab7/11	c62/0
PS0	0	No	b3/51	b5/20	b2/10	a63/0
PS1	0	Use	a6/55	a5/21	a3/12	a66/0
P0PS0	0	No	e4/47	f3/18	f4/8	c53/0
P0PS1	0	Use	d8/49	e1/20	e1/11	abc63/0
P90PS0	90	No	cd3/51	de8/20	d8/10	abc67/0
P90PS1	90	Use	b8/54	d9/20	bc9/11	a77/0
P115PS0	115	No	bc53	cd1/21	d11	ab7/0
P115PS1	115	Use	a57	bc8/21	b1/12	abc67/0
P140PS0	140	No	c9/51	de8/20	e6/9	abc63/0
P140PS1	140	Use	a5/58	a23	a4/14	abc63/0
P165PS0	165	No	bc9/52	bc8/21	cd2/11	abc63/0
P165PS1	165	Use	a58	b8/21	b2/12	bc6/0

Table 3: Comparing the average strains of Hyssop

There is no meaningful difference among the averages with the same letters

Treatments			Average of strains
Name	Quantity of phosphate fertilizer	PSB Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria	Wet performance	Dry performance	Seed performance	Essence performance
P0	0	No	d8/1189	d7/359	c3/214	b101/2
P90	90	No	c5/1422	c3/434	b227	a121/3
P115	115	No	b7/1568	b6/463	b230	a162/3
P140	140	No	a2/1646	a7/502	a9/239	a187/3
P165	165	No	a9/1651	a9/500	a3/238	a088/3
PS0	0	No	b1/1457	b8/437	b3/226	b791/2
PS1	0	Use	a5/1534	a6/466	a3/233	a072/3
P0PS0	0	No	g3/1109	e1/340	f4/208	d805/1
P0PS1	0	Use	f4/1270	d3/379	e1/220	c398/2
P90PS0	90	No	e6/1355	c3/411	de1/224	bc737/2
P90PS1	90	Use	d4/1489	b2/457	bcd230	a505/3
P115PS0	115	No	cd3/1541	b1/440	cde4/227	ab08/3
P115PS1	115	Use	bc1/1596	a1/487	bcd7/232	ab243/3
P140PS0	140	No	ab3/1624	a2/492	bc1/234	ab127/3
P140PS1	140	Use	a1/1668	a1/513	a8/245	ab246/3
P165PS0	165	No	ab3/1655	a8/505	ab7/237	ab205/3
P165PS1	165	Use	ab6/1648	a1/496	ab9/238	abc968/2

Table 4: Comparing the average strains of Hyssop

* There is no meaningful difference among the averages with the same letters

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 1: Comparing the average seed performance in different treatments in Hyssop

Figure 2: Comparing the average performance of the essence percentage in different treatments of Hyssop

Figure 3: Comparing the average performance of the essence in different treatments of Hyssop

Figure 4: Change process of the index of leave surface in application or non-application of the organic fertilizer on Hyssop

Figure 5: Change process of the index of leave surface in application or non-application of the organic fertilizer on Hyssop