Tables at a glance

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Figures at a glance

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Figure 7

Figure 8

Figure 9

Figure 10

Figure 11

Figure 12

Figure 13

Figure 14

Figure 15

Table 1

a (Å)	b (Å)	c (Å)	α (°)	β (°)	γ (°)	V(Å3)	Z
3.77(8)	8.12(5)	10.05(1)	74.80(0)	81.77(0)	81.87(0)	292.87	2

Table 1: Lattice parameters and unit cell volume of Urea-CdCl₂ nanocrystals

Table 2

2 θ (°)		hkl	Stacking fault probability γ
(Measured)	(ICSD # 039960)	hkl	Stacking fault probability γ
10 .68	10.64	001	0.09(8)
13.12	13.18	010	0.13(5)
14.73	14.77	011	0.08(2)
21.43	21.39	002	0.05(3)
25.90	26.05	021	0.16(2)
27.89	27.90	100	0.00(5)
30.96	31.09	-101	0.11(8)
45.26	45.31	024	0.03(1)

Table 2: The stacking fault probability values.

Table 3

parameters	E₀(eV)	E_d(eV)	λ₀(μm)	S₀ (μm^-2)	n_∞
Urea-CdCl₂	4.07	6.72	0.30	17.71	1.62

Table 3: Calculated values of parameters E₀, E_d, λ₀, S₀ and n_∞

Table 4

parameters	ε_∞	wp (10¹⁵ rads^-1)	τ (10^-8s)	*N/m (10⁴⁹g^-1cm^-3)**	σ(S.cm^-1)
Urea-CdCl2	5.71	5.03	1.21	4.00	12400

Table 4: Calculated values of ε_∞, w_p, and other constants

Table 5

	CdCl₂, H₂O	Urea	Urea-CdCl₂ complex
HEK293	2.54	> 100	2.01
MDA	78.19	> 100	61.6
T47D	36.73	77.83	72.92

Table 5: The viability of the used cell lines with specific IC50 values.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1: XRD pattern of the Urea-CdCl₂ powder

FIGURE 2

Figure 2: Evolution of texture coefficient (TC) for the prominent diffraction peaks

FIGURE 3

Figure 3: FTIR spectrum of Urea-CdCl₂ sample

FIGURE 4

Figure 4: Structure of Urea-CdCl₂ [28]

FIGURE 5

Figure 5: Absorption, transmission and reflection spectra of Urea-CdCl₂ complex

FIGURE 6

Figure 6: Variation of absorption coefficient (α) and extinction coefficient (k) of the sample as a function of wavelength

FIGURE 7

Figure 7: Plot of (αhυ)² vs. photon energy for the Urea-CdCl₂ sample

FIGURE 8

Figure 8: Plot of (αhυ)^1/2 vs. photon energy for the Urea-Cd sample

FIGURE 9

Figure 9: ln(α) versus energy (hν)

FIGURE 10

Figure 10: Plot of the refractive index vs. wavelength

FIGURE 11

Figure 11: Plots of (n²-1)^-1 vs (eV)²

FIGURE 12

Figure 12: Plots of (n²-1)^-1 vs (1/λ²)

FIGURE 13

Figure 13: ε₁ vs λ²

FIGURE 14

Figure 14: ε₂ vs λ³

FIGURE 15

Figure 15: Photoluminescence spectrum of Urea-CdCl₂ sample