Figure 1: AA6111 sheet EBSD mapping, (a) AA6111 EBSD map; (b) selected sample for simulation, this selection area represents the sheet texture; (c) pole figure of the selected sample
FIGURE 2
Figure 2: The measured and simulated tensile stress-strain curves along the rolling direction (RD)
FIGURE 3
Figure 3: Schematics of strip ironing and its key dimensions, (a) longitudinal section of the sheet in strip ironing with three ironing dies; (b) key dimensions of ironing: a is die entry angle, ß is die exit angle, is landing lengh, is thickness before ironing, is thickness after ironing and is ironing velocity; (c) longitudinal section of the sheet
FIGURE 4
Figure 4: Schematic diagram of sub-modeling for ironing simulation, in the sub-model, the boundary conditions at edge a,b,c, d are driven by the displacement filed imported from the global model
FIGURE 5
Figure 5: Distribution of the predicted 1st principal strain
FIGURE 6
Figure 6: Predicted texture evolution after ironing ({1 1 1} pole figure plot)
FIGURE 7
Figure 7: Predicted misorientation in ironing, left-side figure presents misorientation angle on non-deformed sample and right-side figure presents misorientation on deformed sample
FIGURE 8
Figure 8: Predicted grain refinement against thickness reduction
FIGURE 9
Figure 9: Effect of step size on grain refinement
FIGURE 10
Figure 10: Effect of strain rate sensitivity on grain refinement
FIGURE 11
Figure 11: Effect of work hardening on grain refinement
FIGURE 12
Figure 12: Effect of coefficient of friction (COF) on grain refinement
FIGURE 13
Figure 13: Effect of coefficient of friction (COF) on shear strain
FIGURE 14
Figure 14: Effect of reduction and ironing pass on grain refinement
Tables at a glance
Figures at a glance