Tables at a glance

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Figures at a glance

Comments

Figure 1

Comments

Figure 2

Comments

Figure 3

Comments

Figure 4

Comments

Figure 5

Table 1

Materials	a (Å)	c (Å)	c/a	B(GPa)	B’	E(Ry)
α -Ti present. Exp. Ref. Others.	2.933 2.950 [7] 2.93 [31] 2.946 [20] 2.95 [32] 2.957 [33]	4.651 4.683 [7] 4.65 [31] 4.666 [20] 4.683 [32] 4.685[33]	1.586 1.583[30] 1.585[33]	107.7 110.02[30]	3.921 3.59[30]	-237.407
	2.922	4.67	1.597	118.9	3.614	-232.54
	2.905	4.64	1.592	118.3	3.738	-235.348
	2.909	4.637	1.590	115.8	4.067	-241.67

Table 1: Calculated lattice parameters (a and c) (Å), mass modulus (GPa) and its derivative and energy (Ry) compared with available theoretical and experimental data.

Table 2

Materials	(GPa)	(GPa)	(GPa)	(GPa)	(GPa)
α -Ti (Present) Others	193.2 175 [30] 171.6 [20] 172.2 [36] 174 [37] 176.1[38] 162.4[39]	57.3 89 [30] 86.8 [20] 70.6 [36] 95 [37] 86.9[38] 92.0[39]	71.4 84 [30] 72.6 [20] 76.3 [36] 72 [37] 68.3[38] 69.0[39]	189.6 192 [30] 190.6 [20] 179.0 [36] 188 [37] 190.5[38] 180.7[39]	46.3 45 [30] 41.1 [20] 29.4 [36] 58 [37] 50.8 [38] 46.7[39]
	187.7	83.1	79.7	211.5	32.7
	186.8	82.3	79.6	209.4	31.8
	168.1	96.09	83.3	187.1	24.4

Table 2: A comparison for the elastic stiffness constants of a-Ti and Ti_0.95 X_0.05alloys.

Table 3

Materials	B(GPa)	G(GPa)	E(GPa)	B/G	ⱱ
This work Others	107.7 107.7 [36] 107.3[43]	55.4 40.5 [36] 43.4 [43]	141.9 105 [7] 108.2 [36] 114.6[43]	1.94 2.65 [36] 2.47[43]	0.280 0.332 [36] 0.363[43]
	118.9	46.5	116.01	2.55	0.337
	118.3	42.5	114.09	2.78	0.339
	115.8	31.7	87.3	3.65	0.369

Table 3: The mechanical properties of a-Ti and Ti_0.95 X_0.05alloy

Table 4

Materials	VP(m/s)	VB(m/s)	VG(m/s)	T̊ de debye (K̊)
α -Ti	6323.38	4857.96	3505.56	448.30
	6087.18	4964.72	3050.23	392.13
	6142.61	5017.79	3068.39	396.77
	5701.60	4852.63	2592.32	336.32

Table 4: Other mechanical properties of Ti_0.95 X_0.05alloy

FIGURE 1

Figure 1: Baseline 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan (18F-FDG PET/CT): (a) High uptake in the cervical mass (SUVmax = 20.84), (b) cutaneous nodules in the back (SUVmax = 20.75), and (d) liver secondary nodule of segment VII (SUVmax = 6.20). (b) PET maximum intensity projection of the patient

FIGURE 2

Figure 2: Post-operative whole body scan 131 iodine (131I) (a) showed residual uptake in the latero-tracheal remnant mass (d ), hepatic lesion (b), as well as the emergence of an upper left paratracheal metastatic lymph node ( c)

FIGURE 3

Figure 3: Post-operative whole body scan 131 iodine (131I) (a) showed residual uptake in the latero-tracheal remnant mass (d ), hepatic lesion (b), as well as the emergence of an upper left paratracheal metastatic lymph node ( c)

FIGURE 4

Figure 4: Post-operative whole body scan 131 iodine (131I) (a) showed residual uptake in the latero-tracheal remnant mass (d ), hepatic lesion (b), as well as the emergence of an upper left paratracheal metastatic lymph node ( c)

FIGURE 5

Figure 5: Post-operative whole body scan 131 iodine (131I) (a) showed residual uptake in the latero-tracheal remnant mass (d ), hepatic lesion (b), as well as the emergence of an upper left paratracheal metastatic lymph node ( c)