Table 1

Table 2a

Table 2b

Table 3

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Total no of patients	70
Patients prescribed with multiple AEDs	33 (47.1%)	Patients prescribed with monotherapy AEDs	37 (52.85%)
Patients prescribed with AEDs irrationally	29 (41.4%)	Patients prescribed with AEDs rationally	41 (58.57%)

Table 1: Patients prescribed with multiple AEDs and irrational prescribing

Patients prescribed with multiple AEDs	33
Patients prescribed with multiple AEDs rationally	14 (42.42%)
Patients prescribed with multiple AEDs irrationally	19 (57.57%)

Table 2a: Patients prescribed with multiple AEDs rationally and irrationally

	Number of patients prescribed with multiple AEDs rationally	Total no of patients prescribed with multiple AEDs irrationally
Dual therapy (2 Drugs)	6 (42.85%)	13(68.42%)
Triple therapy (3 Drugs)	7 (50.00%)	6 (31.57)
Quadruple therapy (4 Drugs)	1(7.14%)	0

Table 2b: Extent of therapeutic duplication prescribed rationally and irrationally

Patients prescribed with AEDs irrationally	29
Prophylactic AEDs	12(41.37%)
Therapeutic duplication without performing TDM	8(27.58%)
Inappropriate dose of AEDs	3(10.34%)
Inappropriate duration	1(3.44%)
No Baseline lab record	21(72.41%)
Follow up labs missing for last 6 months	1 (3.44%)

Table 3: Different indicators determining irrational prescribing