Tables at a glance

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Figures at a glance

Comments

Figure 1

Comments

Figure 2

Comments

Figure 3

Comments

Figure 4

Comments

Figure 5

Comments

Figure 6

Comments

Figure 7

Comments

Figure 8

Comments

Figure 9

Comments

Figure 10

Comments

Figure 11

Table 1

Sample code	Duration of electrospinning (hr)	Thickness (average of 10 different areas) (µm)
Sample code	Duration of electrospinning (hr)	Mean	CV%
A	4	269	9.66
B	6	481	9.35
C	8	761	9.59

Table 1 : Thickness of samples

Table 2

Sample code	Air permeability (ml/s.)		Water vapor permeability (g/.day)
Sample code	Mean	CV%	Mean	CV%
A	1.5	4.66	0.128	6.58
B	1.44	3.47	0.122	3.42
C	1.42	2.81	0.119	1.82

Table 2 : Average air permeability (pressure: 100 Pa) and average water vapor permeability of samples (g/?.day)

Table 3

Sample code	Maximum pressure force for compression (after 3 cm compression) (mN)		Maximum pressure force through 12 mm indentation depth (N)
Sample code	Mean	CV%	Mean	CV%
A	3.55	11.27	5.04690	9.97
B	9.68	9.50	14.0420	9.75
C	35.89	8.35	33.69843	7.32

Table 3 : Average maximum pressure force for compressing samples (after 3 cm compressing displacement) and the maximum pressure force for indentation.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1: Schematic setup of electrospinning.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2: Schematic set up for compression by Instron tensile tester.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3: Schematic setup for indentation by Instron tensile tester.

FIGURE 4

Figure 4: Different cross-sections; circular and oval (elliptic)

FIGURE 5

Figure 5: SEM image of electrospun polyurethane layer.

FIGURE 6

Figure 6: Effect of electrospinning duration (thickness) on the indentation force.

FIGURE 7

Figure 7: Effect of electrospinning duration (thickness) on compression force.

FIGURE 8

Figure 8: shows the relationship between load and strain in the cyclic loading for the electrospun PU layer.

FIGURE 9

Figure 9: The average of tension and the amount of average extension at 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of strain

FIGURE 10

Figure 10: Average of calculated pressure of circular cross-sectional body limb at different amounts of extension different amounts of reduction factor

FIGURE 11

Figure 11: Average of calculated pressure for oval (Elliptic) cross-sectional body limb at different radiuses depending on the angles at 100% of strain