Table 2 : Average air permeability (pressure: 100 Pa) and average water vapor permeability of samples (g/?.day)
Table 3
Sample code
Maximum pressure force for compression (after 3 cm compression) (mN)
Maximum pressure force through 12 mm indentation depth (N)
Mean
CV%
Mean
CV%
A
3.55
11.27
5.04690
9.97
B
9.68
9.50
14.0420
9.75
C
35.89
8.35
33.69843
7.32
Table 3 : Average maximum pressure force for compressing samples (after 3 cm compressing displacement) and the maximum pressure force for indentation.
FIGURE 1
Figure 1: Schematic setup of electrospinning.
FIGURE 2
Figure 2: Schematic set up for compression by Instron tensile tester.
FIGURE 3
Figure 3: Schematic setup for indentation by Instron tensile tester.
FIGURE 4
Figure 4: Different cross-sections; circular and oval (elliptic)
FIGURE 5
Figure 5: SEM image of electrospun polyurethane layer.
FIGURE 6
Figure 6: Effect of electrospinning duration (thickness) on the indentation force.
FIGURE 7
Figure 7: Effect of electrospinning duration (thickness) on compression force.
FIGURE 8
Figure 8: shows the relationship between load and strain in the cyclic loading for the electrospun PU layer.
FIGURE 9
Figure 9: The average of tension and the amount of average extension at 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of strain
FIGURE 10
Figure 10: Average of calculated pressure of circular cross-sectional body limb at different amounts of extension different amounts of reduction factor
FIGURE 11
Figure 11: Average of calculated pressure for oval (Elliptic) cross-sectional body limb at different radiuses depending on the angles at 100%
of strain
Tables at a glance
Figures at a glance