Tables at a glance

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Figures at a glance

Comments

Figure1

Comments

Figure2

Comments

Figure3

Table1

Group	BMI	Lesions in diameter	TNM stage [n (%)]			Lesion location [n (%)]
Group	(kg/m2)	(cm)	II	III	IV	External superior	Internal superior	External inferior	Internal inferior
Observation group	23.2±1.8	2.61±0.67	23(35.93)	25(39.06)	16(25.00)	15(23.44)	18(28.13)	21(32.81)	10(15.62)
Control group	22.9±2.2	2.75±0.70	26(40.63)	26(40.63)	13(19.74)	12(18.75)	24(37.50)	15(23.41)	13(19.74)
T value	0.818	-1.119	2.052			2.747
P value	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05			>0.05

Table 1: General data of the two groups

Table2

	Shorten	Prolong	Total	P
n≤12	2	6	8
12n<17	27	20	47
N≥17	7	2	9
TOTAL	36	28	64	0.005

Table 2: Chi-square test between menarche time and postoperative QT interval change

Table3

	Y(< 0)	N (≥0)	Total	P
Yes	0	12	12
No	29	23	52
Total	29	35	64	0.028

Table 3: Chi-square test of diabetes mellitus and postoperative QT interval changes

FIGURE1

Figure 1: Comparison of myocardial enzyme indexes of both groups. * P < 0.05, compared with the CG; # P < 0.05, compared with T0; & P < 0.05, compared to T1

FIGURE2

Figure 2: Comparison of echocardiographic indicators between the two groups. * P < 0.05, compared with the CG; # P < 0.05, compared to T0

FIGURE3a

Figure 3: Comparison of electrocardiogram indexes between the two groups. *P < 0.05, compared with the CG; # P < 0.05, compared with T0; & P < 0.05, compared to T1