Tables at a glance

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Figures at a glance

Figure 1

Figure 2

Table 1

Age	Mean ± SD	14± 3.5
	Range	12-30
Gender
	Female	27(45%)
	Male	33(55)%

SD = standard deviation
Table 1: Demographic data Charactricteristic

Table 2

Sound eye	Median	98.8	114.9	113	74.75	66
	Mean±SD	90 ± 15	110 ± 10	109 ± 16	70 ± 15	60± 14.3
	range	74 - 108	95 - 130	92 - 130	52 - 106	51 - 100
Amblyopic eye	Median	80.6	101.5	95.6	62.6	57.5
	Mean±SD	85 ± 20	100 ± 15	90± 17	60 ± 10	55 ± 14
	range	70 - 95	82 - 134	78 - 113	42 - 99	42 - 71
Difference	Median	18.2	13.4	17.4	12.55	8.5
(Sound-Amblyopic) amblyopia)	Mean±SD	5±5	10 ± 5	19± I	10± 6	5 ± 0.3
	Range	4 - 13	3 - 13	14 - 17	7 - 10	9 - 29
P		0.2	().022	0.1	0.0	0.1
		Average	SUPERIOR	Inferior	Nasal	Temporal

Table 2: OCT Measurements among groups in micron

Table 3

YEP parameters		PI00 amplitude	P 100 latency
		µv±	(MS)
Sound	Median	14	100
	Mean ± SD	12± 5	94 ± 10
	range	(10 -20)	(95 -110)
Amblyopic	Median	7	120
	mean± SD	5±4	113± 30
	range	3-8	(112-145)
Difference	Median	7	20
	mean± SD	7±1	19±20
	range	7-12	17-35

Table 3: VEP Parameters

Table 4

Visual cuity (V.A)	P100 amplitude	P100 latency
	R=0.8 R=0.3 P=0.005 P=0.001

Table 4: correlation between VEP parameters and visual acuity
R= correlation coefficient. r>5 good correlation, R<5 weak correlation There is weak correlation between p100 latency and V.A,Strong correlation between VA and amplitude of p100

Table 5

VEP

RNFL

P100 amp

P100 latency

R                             p
0.4                         0.01
0.3                         0.05

Table 5: Correlation between VEP parameters and OCT
There is insignificant correlation between VEP AND OCT Parameters

FIGURE 1

Figure 1: Insignificant difference in RNFL thickness is noted between normal and amblyopic eyes. Normal RNFL thickness in both amblyopic and non amblyopic

FIGURE 2

Figure 2: The Difference between normal and amblyopic eyes with VEP