Figure 1: Normal group in which normal SWAP(with normal GHT,MD,CSPD, &no localized VF defect)&normal RNFL thickness in all quadrants in OCT
Groups |
Sex |
Age |
|
|
Female |
Male |
|
Control group |
15 |
15 |
46 ± 10 |
Glaucoma Suspect |
12 |
13 |
48 ± 13 |
Group |
|||
Glaucoma group |
18 |
17 |
49 ± 15 |
Table 1: Demographic Features of Subjects
|
Normal |
Gla suspect |
Glaucoma |
||
Early |
Moderate |
Severe |
|||
Average |
99±15.5 |
94±12 |
88±9.9 |
75±9.0 |
55±20 |
RNFL quadrants |
|||||
Superior |
126±10.5 |
120±12 |
100±11.0 |
85±10 |
60±18 |
Inferior |
128±11. |
111±13 |
95±13.0 |
80±10.5 |
55±16. |
Nasal |
89±8.5 |
80±10 |
75±7.8 |
55±11.9 |
44±9. |
Temporal |
69±7.7 |
65±9.5 |
60±10.9 |
50±12.2 |
35±9 |
Superior-inferior difference |
2±0.5 |
4±1.0 |
5±2.0 |
5±0.5 |
5±2.0 |
Table 2: OCT parameters among groups
Clock hours |
Control |
Suspect |
Glaucoma |
12 |
121±13 |
111±11. |
85±30.5 |
11(superio temporal) |
114±11 |
106±12. |
97±15.9 |
10 |
98±9.9 |
90±15.4 |
81±13.3 |
9 (temporal) |
75±8.8 |
68±7.9 |
59±12.2 |
8 |
87.6±7. |
81±6.6 |
70±11.8 |
7 (inferior temporal) |
115±10 |
106±9.5 |
90±10.2 |
6 |
122±11 |
103±15 |
89±26.2 |
5 |
108±10 |
105±8.8 |
90±14.2 |
4 |
80±7.7 |
75±10.5 |
66.3±9.6 |
3 (nasal) |
79±8.9 |
70±6.6 |
59±11.2 |
2 |
88.9±9 |
85±7.7 |
63±12.3 |
1 |
112±10 |
101±11 |
83.3±11.2 |
Table 3: OCT over clock hours
|
Control |
Suspect |
Early |
Moderate |
Severe |
CSPD |
0.3±0.4 |
0.6±0.6 |
1.0±1.0 |
2.1±1.5 |
3.5±2.1 |
Mean deviation |
|||||
Mean |
0.77±0.5 |
1.1±1.2 |
1.3±2.5 |
6.2±2.9 |
12.5±5.9 |
Superior sector |
0.51±0.3 |
1.0±1.6 |
2.3±3.6 |
6.6±3.9 |
12.9±7.6 |
Inferior sector |
0.42±0.1 |
1.0±1.1 |
1.9±2.3 |
6.1±2.2 |
12.2±4.6 |
Superior-inferior difference |
0.1±0.2 |
0.0±0.5 |
0.4±0.3 |
0.5±1.7 |
0.7±3.0 |
Table 4: SWAP parameters among group
SWAP |
RNFL thickness |
|
Area |
R |
P |
Global Indices |
||
MD |
-0.2 |
0.10 |
CSPD |
0.1 |
0.35 |
Regional |
||
Superior MD by Inferior RNFL |
- 0.41 |
0.002 |
Inferior MD by Superior RNFL |
- 0.39 |
0.005 |
Hemi field difference |
0.33 |
0.004 |
Table 5: Correlation between RNFL thickness & SWAP parameters in glaucoma Suspect
SWAP |
RNFL |
|
|
R |
P |
Global Indices |
||
MD |
-0.52 |
0.000 |
CSPD |
0.55 |
0.001 |
Regional |
||
Superior MD by Inferior RNFL |
-0.66 |
0.001 |
Inferior MD by Superior RNFL |
- 0.50 |
0.000 |
Table 6: Correlation between RNFL thickness & SWAP parameters in glaucoma group
OCT |
Glaucoma suspect ROC areas |
Early glaucoma ROC areas |
Average |
0.800 |
0.856 |
Quadrants |
|
|
Superior |
0.712 |
0.811 |
Inferior |
0.822 |
0.897 |
Nasal |
0.650 |
0.700 |
Temporal |
0.690 |
0.750 |
Table 7: ROC Curve areas of OCT
Figure 1: Normal group in which normal SWAP(with normal GHT,MD,CSPD, &no localized VF defect)&normal RNFL thickness in all quadrants in OCT
Figure 2: Glaucoma suspect with abnormal cupping in which normal SWAP (with normal GHT, MD,CSPD, &no localized VF defect)&OCT shows inferonasal thinning
Figure 3: Glaucoma suspect with abnormal cupping in which normal SWAP (with normal GHT,MD,CSPD, &no localized VF defect)& normal OCT in all quadrants
Figure 4: Early glaucoma in which lower &nasal relative scotoma in SWAP &inferior RNFL thinning in OCT
Figure 5: Moderate glaucoma shows superior arcuate scotoma in SWAP &inferior RNFL thinning in OCT
Figure 6: Sever glaucoma shows superior& inferior arcuate scotoma in SWAP &inferior &superior RNFL thinning in OCT
Tables at a glance
Figures at a glance